Skip to main content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot Gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

HTTPS

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Evaluation of A Cloudy COLD-AIR Pool In The Columbian River Basin In Different Versions of The HIGH-RESOLUTION Rapid Refresh (HRRR) Model.

Abstract

The accurate forecast of persistent orographic cold-air pools in numerical weather prediction models is essential for the optimal integration of wind energy into the electrical grid during these events. Model development efforts during the Second Wind Forecast Improvement Project (WFIP2) aimed to address the challenges also related to this. We evaluated three different versions of NOAA's High-Resolution Rapid Refresh model with two different horizontal grid spacings against in situ and remote sensing observations to investigate how developments in physical parameterizations and numerical methods targeted during WFIP2 impacted the simulation of a persistent cold-air pool in the Columbia River Basin. Differences between the different model versions were in particular visible in the simulated temperature and low-level cloud fields. The model developments led to an enhanced low-level cloud cover in the cold pool, resulting in better agreement with the observations. This removed a diurnal cycle in the near-surface temperature bias at stations throughout the basin by reducing a cold bias during the night and a warm bias during the day. However, low-level clouds did not clear sufficiently during daytime in the newest model version, which led to a warm bias near-the surface during the second night of the reforecasts and leaves room for further model developments. Besides the improvements during the persistent phase of the cold pool, the model developments also led to a better representation of its decay by slowing down its erosion.

Article / Publication Data
Active/Online
YES
Available Metadata
Early Online Release
July 19, 2022
Fiscal Year
Peer Reviewed
YES
Publication Name
Geoscientific Model Development
Published On
January 26, 2023
Publisher Name
EGUsphere
Submitted On
May 18, 2022
URL ↗

Authors

Authors who have authored or contributed to this publication.

  • Bianca Adler - Not Positioned Other noaa
    Cooperative Institute for Research in Environmental Sciences, University of Colorado Boulder
    NOAA/Global Systems Laboratory
  • Laura Bianco - Not Positioned Psl
    Cooperative Institute for Research in Environmental Sciences, University of Colorado Boulder
    NOAA/Global Systems Laboratory
  • Irina V. Djalalova - Not Positioned Other noaa
    Cooperative Institute for Research in Environmental Sciences, University of Colorado Boulder
    NOAA/Global Systems Laboratory
  • Jaymes S. Kenyon - Not Positioned Gsl
    Cooperative Institute for Research in Environmental Sciences, University of Colorado Boulder
    NOAA/Global Systems Laboratory
  • Joseph B. Olson - Not Positioned Gsl
    Federal
  • David (Dave) D. Turner - Not Positioned Gsl
    Federal
  • James M. wilczak - Not Positioned Other noaa
    Federal